But maybe, amidst the chaos and clamor, some unhysterical, sane concepts are being spread. There’s a piece that went up on HuffPo about Alcoholics Anonymous—an organization that is pretty much consistently misunderstood and criticized in the mainstream press—and it’s decidedly on-point and positive. The focus of it is a study which tracked the “self-efficacy, or empowerment” of members and determined:
• The more the individual identified him/herself as a recovering alcoholic (addict) the higher was his/her level of self-efficacy.
• Higher self-efficacy was associated with more months clean and/or sober.
• The more the individual leaned toward the recovering identity the less likely she/he was to report having relapsed into drinking or drug use during the pervious two years.
Look, I’m not saying we’re all going to be seeing eye-to-eye and talking about addiction in a way that’s only useful and effective now. But until now, the majority of what I’ve read in the mainstream press about AA has erroneously called it ineffective or focused on the so-called dangers of people identifying themselves by their disease, always spinning that in some way that makes it sound like this identification is used in order to keep addicts feeling enslaved. But this piece concludes that “the evidence suggests that…coming to the point where an individual is able to embrace that identity can help to solidify his or her recovery.”
Such a measured, accurate conclusion. Maybe there’s hope for us yet.
Photo courtesy of FanPop